|
Title: package naming conventions Post by: Neil Manuell on July 24, 2008, 02:15:55 Ok, I'm writing a set of utilities for pureMVC
and I wanted opinions regarding packages, and the best practice. at the mo, my packages are name like this: uk.co.revisual.puremvc so all my code implemented using pureMVC is in this package. Is this acceptable, and easy to port to other peoples class libraries without too much confusion? Title: Re: package naming conventions Post by: puremvc on July 24, 2008, 04:46:09 If you plan on distributing and maintaining the utilities on your own site, then of course, this will be fine.
If you'd like to contribute them to the project, then you'll need to repackage according to the naming conventions you see with the rest of the PureMVC demos and utilities. See the post in the Contributor Central board for more info about this. -=Cliff> Title: Re: package naming conventions Post by: Neil Manuell on July 24, 2008, 04:53:07 ok, cool, I didn't realise I could contribute so easily.
Will get my project up to scratch first :~) |