Futurescale, Inc. PureMVC Home

The PureMVC Framework Code at the Speed of Thought


Over 10 years of community discussion and knowledge are maintained here as a read-only archive.

New discussions should be taken up in issues on the appropriate projects at https://github.com/PureMVC

Show Posts

* | |

  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  PureMVC Manifold / Demos and Utils / Re: Blog - A PureMVC Python / Google App Engine Demo on: April 16, 2008, 01:08:11
No reason to keep state in this demo.

It is necessary to keep state, though? I was hoping to use it in real life regardless of its demo status.
2  PureMVC Manifold / Demos and Utils / Re: PureMVC + Google App Engine - Blog Demo on: April 14, 2008, 07:43:47
there are any requests from clients. I'm slightly worried how this will affect multiple concurrent client requests since they would theoretically share facade, mediator and proxy instances due to the singleton

No threading in App Engine, so no concurrent requests. The main() business is just for AST caching, not for AST sharing.

But still, to be safe, you could add a global mutex.

If you are talking about persisting state *between* requests then you need sessions, no other way around it.
Pages: [1]