|
|
Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
1
|
PureMVC Manifold / MultiCore Version / Some thoughts about puremvc and view cluttering
|
on: December 09, 2010, 01:02:13
|
Hi Cliff,
Currently we are using command to register mediators, which typically requires view as notification body. But generally passing view as notification body is not preferable (correct me if I am wrong). So is it okay to pass view as notification body in case of any mediator registration (for e.g. startupcommand) ? or any other better by which we can separate out puremvc from view so view can be reusable without depending on any specific framework.
Thanks,
Ankur Shah
|
|
|
2
|
PureMVC Manifold / MultiCore Version / In proxy should I remove listeners explicitly ?
|
on: April 08, 2010, 12:01:28
|
Hi All,
Currently I am working on flex application where I am using multicore variant of puremvc. My question is in my proxy I am making remote call and attaching some (RESULT and FAULT) event listener. So in my event handler code should I remove listeners explicitly for making remoteObject class eligible for garbage collecton ?
public function getTableGridData():void { var hostController:RemoteObject=this.hostController("ABC"); hostController.addEventListener(ResultEvent.RESULT, handleResult); hostController.addEventListener(FaultEvent.FAULT, handleFault); hostController.getTableData(); }
private function handleResult(event:ResultEvent):void { ApplicationFacade.getInstance(key).sendNotification("abc", event.result); }
So here hostController holds strong reference of both the listeners. So after resultEvent does hostController is eligible for garbage collection or I have to mention weak reference for listeners for making hostController eligible for garbage collectioin ?
|
|
|
|
|