Futurescale, Inc. PureMVC Home

The PureMVC Framework Code at the Speed of Thought

Over 10 years of community discussion and knowledge are maintained here as a read-only archive.

New discussions should be taken up in issues on the appropriate projects at https://github.com/PureMVC

Show Posts

| * |

  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Announcements and General Discussion / Public Demos, Tools and Applications / Flex with PureMVC on Rails on: January 30, 2008, 05:41:56
This is my first attempt at a PureMVC application, so I'm open to constructive criticism. The zip has both the Ruby/Rails and the Flex source, and it's too large to upload to this forum. I also don't have Rails hosting as yet, so there's no online demo, but you can get the zip and read a fuller description of the application here: http://www.robsondesign.com/blog/index.php/2008/01/28/flex-on-rails-iteration-one/

Let me know what you think!

- Jim
2  Announcements and General Discussion / Getting Started / Redundant Implements directive on: January 16, 2008, 05:07:18
In the framework code and sample applications, there seem to be some redundant "implements" directives.

For example, in the Architecture sample, the RolePanelMediator class is declared like so:

public class RolePanelMediator extends Mediator implements IMediator
However, Mediator implements IMediator; therefore, as I understand it, any subclass of Mediator implicitly implements IMediator. That being the case, the explicit "implements" in the subclass appears redundant. What is the rationale for including it?
3  Announcements and General Discussion / Getting Started / Need for getProxyName method on: January 15, 2008, 06:15:08
What is the purpose of the getProxyName method? Admittedly, I'm still a PureMVC n00b, but at this point I don't envision using this method very often. What would be the consequences if I were to write my proxy classes without implementing IProxy - and thereby omitting this method? I would like to write proxy classes that extend Notifier but do not implement IProxy. Would this be wrong, and if so, why?
Pages: [1]