This is my first attempt at a PureMVC application, so I'm open to constructive criticism. The zip has both the Ruby/Rails and the Flex source, and it's too large to upload to this forum. I also don't have Rails hosting as yet, so there's no online demo, but you can get the zip and read a fuller description of the application here: http://www.robsondesign.com/blog/index.php/2008/01/28/flex-on-rails-iteration-one/

Let me know what you think!

- Jim

In the framework code and sample applications, there seem to be some redundant "implements" directives.

For example, in the Architecture sample, the RolePanelMediator class is declared like so:

:

public class RolePanelMediator extends Mediator implements IMediator
However, Mediator implements IMediator; therefore, as I understand it, any subclass of Mediator implicitly implements IMediator. That being the case, the explicit "implements" in the subclass appears redundant. What is the rationale for including it?

What is the purpose of the getProxyName method? Admittedly, I'm still a PureMVC n00b, but at this point I don't envision using this method very often. What would be the consequences if I were to write my proxy classes without implementing IProxy - and thereby omitting this method? I would like to write proxy classes that extend Notifier but do not implement IProxy. Would this be wrong, and if so, why?