Futurescale, Inc. PureMVC Home

The PureMVC Framework Code at the Speed of Thought


Over 10 years of community discussion and knowledge are maintained here as a read-only archive.

New discussions should be taken up in issues on the appropriate projects at https://github.com/PureMVC

Show Posts

| * |

  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Announcements and General Discussion / General Discussion / PureMVC FaceBook Page on: August 27, 2009, 12:42:02
Hi,

I've noticed that there is no PureMVC pages on Facebook... so i've created one...

http://www.facebook.com/pages/PureMVC/128081860951

Cliff and other contributors can add me (Francois Polykrom Dejardin) and i'll added you to administrators...

Regards

:::Poly:::
2  Announcements and General Discussion / General Discussion / Shell Global Content Sharing in a Multi Core/Pipes application on: August 16, 2009, 02:38:43
Hi,

As i said in a previous post, I've successfully integrate Pipes in my PureMvc Multicore application.

In my Startup shell,i get Config and Content of my application, I use StartupManager to load 2 XML files (Config.xml,Content.xml), these xml are parsed and put in 2 values objects. At this point, no problem.
The two vo are accessible by my shell main container, I then load different cores modules that have their own facade and so on... but these modules need the content too...and i've also need to update shell vo from my modules.
I've read some posts here and best practice seems to not considere the Shell to be a "grand station central".. and it makes sense..
Actually when i load a module and check that this module is initialized, i send a notification from the shell to module pipe with the content vo...
Is it the best way to get and post global vo between Shell and Module or have i to create a centralize module to keep all (It would be the same issue that the shell solution).

Thanks for your advices !

:::Poly:::

3  Announcements and General Discussion / General Discussion / StateMachine with Sub Components State on: August 13, 2009, 12:43:37
Hi all !

I'm developping a RIA based on PureMvc Framework.. I have a main Application that already use StateMachine to swap from state to state.
But in each state, i have components that have also states, so kind of sub states...
Is it possible to define these sub states in the injected fsm definition or have i to redefine a fsm for each component ?
I try to get examples here and on google it without success.

Thanks a lot

4  Announcements and General Discussion / General Discussion / StateMachine with <mx:State> vs StateMachine with <mx:ViewStack> on: July 19, 2009, 11:42:32
Hi,

I was wondering what is the best way to implement state change mechanism.
In differents examples i saw when google it, the ViewStack solution is often used but what about State solution ?
In my application i've implemented the State solution with a currentState="{state}" in the component definition, and everything is allright. The only difference using that way is that i've to create a switch to notify the Application facade in the component Mediator with the correct component reference in place of the currentState.
Is it a "best practice" or a wrong way ?

thanks a lot

pureMVC rocks !

Poly
Pages: [1]