Futurescale, Inc. PureMVC Home

The PureMVC Framework Code at the Speed of Thought


Over 10 years of community discussion and knowledge are maintained here as a read-only archive.

New discussions should be taken up in issues on the appropriate projects at https://github.com/PureMVC

Show Posts

* | |

  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2]
16  Announcements and General Discussion / General Discussion / StateMachine with Sub Components State on: August 13, 2009, 12:43:37
Hi all !

I'm developping a RIA based on PureMvc Framework.. I have a main Application that already use StateMachine to swap from state to state.
But in each state, i have components that have also states, so kind of sub states...
Is it possible to define these sub states in the injected fsm definition or have i to redefine a fsm for each component ?
I try to get examples here and on google it without success.

Thanks a lot

17  Announcements and General Discussion / General Discussion / Re: StateMachine with <mx:State> vs StateMachine with <mx:ViewStack> on: July 20, 2009, 04:04:51

Thanks a lot Cliff...

I think i'm in the right way regarding your answer !

regards !!

François (Belgian pureMVC addict)
18  Announcements and General Discussion / General Discussion / StateMachine with <mx:State> vs StateMachine with <mx:ViewStack> on: July 19, 2009, 11:42:32
Hi,

I was wondering what is the best way to implement state change mechanism.
In differents examples i saw when google it, the ViewStack solution is often used but what about State solution ?
In my application i've implemented the State solution with a currentState="{state}" in the component definition, and everything is allright. The only difference using that way is that i've to create a switch to notify the Application facade in the component Mediator with the correct component reference in place of the currentState.
Is it a "best practice" or a wrong way ?

thanks a lot

pureMVC rocks !

Poly
Pages: 1 [2]