Futurescale, Inc. PureMVC Home

The PureMVC Framework Code at the Speed of Thought


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 12, 2017, 04:50:19 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Please DM @puremvc on Twitter to gain forum access. Spambots are why we can't have nice things.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: August 26, 2017, 12:19:38 PM 
Started by piotrzarzycki - Last post by puremvc
Feel free to add the info to the public list about the swcs.

 2 
 on: July 19, 2017, 02:16:29 AM 
Started by piotrzarzycki - Last post by piotrzarzycki
Hi Cliff,

Thanks for all your help. I will fork your repository on github and add there pom for Maven. Would it be ok if I add information about nature of those swc on Development list and users list ? - That is fully archived and available for a public view.

Unfortunately I provide you also wrong information. Maven pom will produce two swc: "puremvc-flexjs-as3-multicore-framework.swc" and "puremvc-flexjs-as3-multicore-framework-js.swc". User who would like to create application in FlexJS using PureMVC will pickup one of those artifact depends on what type of application would like to have on the output: "Falsh" or "JavaScript".

Thanks,
Piotr

 3 
 on: June 12, 2017, 11:03:59 AM 
Started by piotrzarzycki - Last post by puremvc
There is no flash dependency. I understand if it's difficult to get the test runner going, but for a framework, it's difficult to gain adoption if there aren't unit tests with full coverage. I think it would be fine for you to make your combined AS/JS swc available in Maven, but it would be nice if you include a link to a page on the FlexJS site that explains the nature of the swc.

Cheers,
-=Cliff>

 4 
 on: June 05, 2017, 11:54:09 PM 
Started by piotrzarzycki - Last post by piotrzarzycki
I'm sorry about that, but not sure what do you mean - Do you mean those tests ? [1]. If yes - No I didn't prepare pom for tests, but if the thing is to prepare build for those tests to FlexJS and make runnable in Live Test Runner I can try, but it would be a long road, cause I will have to prepare flexunit to this things more.

If those tests has any dependency to Flash, probably I will have to fork repository and also make some changes to the unit tests to handle SWF sight.

[1] https://github.com/PureMVC/puremvc-as3-multicore-unittests

Piotr

 5 
 on: June 05, 2017, 10:44:13 AM 
Started by piotrzarzycki - Last post by puremvc
Ok, in that case, I suppose your proposed name will make sense. Are the tests ported and working?

-=Cliff>

 6 
 on: June 05, 2017, 03:04:47 AM 
Started by piotrzarzycki - Last post by piotrzarzycki
Basically yes. Thanks to this SWC you can compile your app to: SWF and JS.

 7 
 on: May 31, 2017, 12:31:46 PM 
Started by piotrzarzycki - Last post by puremvc
So, the "puremvc-flexjs-as3-multicore-framework" swc actually contains both the AS and the JS in it?

-=Cilff>

 8 
 on: May 29, 2017, 11:20:54 PM 
Started by piotrzarzycki - Last post by piotrzarzycki
Cliff,

You mean why JavaScript version of PureMVC will not work for us - I think it can work, but using it in FlexJS Application will be in that way slightly different. It will require wrappers written in ActionScript around JS version of PureMVC. - Cause this version is not understandable by FlexJS compiler.

Let me explain how actually this swc will help.

Basically when I'm taking your code and build it through FlexJS compiler (FalconJX) each classes is transpiled from ActionScript to JavaScript. I have one to one code - inside "puremvc-flexjs-as3-multicore-framework" - Each AS class has mirror to JavaScript class.

Let say that I would like to write application in FlexJS - I'm writing it in ActionScript using ActionScript port of PureMVC, but in order to compile my app to JavaScript version by FalconJX compiler I need "puremvc-flexjs-as3-multicore-framework" swc.

Of course I could use during compilation your AS version of PureMVC and compiling it each time along with my app, but I wanted to avoid that having  "puremvc-flexjs-as3-multicore-framework" swc.

Ideally would be store this swc somewhere in public maven repository, but your statement that framework should be tied to language not a framework I have started to think that maybe that was a bad idea. I just wanted to have more automate flow for development.

Thoughts ?

Piotr

 9 
 on: May 27, 2017, 02:56:04 PM 
Started by piotrzarzycki - Last post by puremvc
Refresh me why the JavaScript port won't do? Your suggested title puremvc-flexjs-as3-multicore-framework triggered me, because the framework should really be tied to a language and not a framework.

Cheers,
-=Cliff>

 10 
 on: May 21, 2017, 09:45:43 PM 
Started by piotrzarzycki - Last post by piotrzarzycki
Hi Cliff,

I'm sorry for the delays in responses I was occupy by ApacheCon. Smiley I think I know what I need to do, but there are still some questions to you.

1) In order to have flexjspuremvc.swc in maven repository I will have to probably pass through some paper work in sonatype [1]
2) Ideally would be if you could get into your github - pure mvc code with my prepared pom.xml - it would be some variation of [2] - maybe something /puremvc-flexjs-as3-multicore-framework. If it's rather not possible I will fork your repo and will be holding on my own everything.

Let me know what do you think.

[1] http://central.sonatype.org/
[2] https://github.com/PureMVC/puremvc-as3-multicore-framework

Thanks,
Piotr

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10