Futurescale, Inc. PureMVC Home

The PureMVC Framework Code at the Speed of Thought


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 21, 2017, 05:41:50 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Please DM @puremvc on Twitter to gain forum access. Spambots are why we can't have nice things.
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: PureMVC4GWT on google code VS multicore port  (Read 5406 times)
abhisec
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


View Profile Email
« on: April 07, 2009, 09:29:29 AM »

There seems to be some discrepancies between the two.

1) Lucianno is using a CommadProvider to retrieve commands and only storing class names.

2) Official port stuffs objects in hashmap.

I am not sure why the first approach was rejected? It seems a little light weight as those associative arrays are not being stuffed with object instances and being created when needed?

am i missing something?
Logged
fede
Newbie
*
Posts: 7


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2009, 12:33:58 AM »

hi i haven't seen the CommandProvider impl but IMHO the problem with  gwt is that "no easy form" of reflection is usable so it's difficult to store class Object and then build on demand command instances. It should be done using the deferred binding mechanism that gwt has, but it complicates the design.
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to: