jimrobson
|
|
« on: January 16, 2008, 05:07:18 » |
|
In the framework code and sample applications, there seem to be some redundant "implements" directives.
For example, in the Architecture sample, the RolePanelMediator class is declared like so:
public class RolePanelMediator extends Mediator implements IMediator However, Mediator implements IMediator; therefore, as I understand it, any subclass of Mediator implicitly implements IMediator. That being the case, the explicit "implements" in the subclass appears redundant. What is the rationale for including it?
|