I wanted to do a little test to see if the name constants for all types were unique per singleton instance.
For example, I have two application facades with different keys. I then have an application mediator for each, but with the same name. It appears as though somewhere along the line, the same names are conflicting when I would expect them to be partitioned off by the facade key.
Is this assumption not correct?
I've attached my demo project showing the problem, but let me describe:
I created a hello google project which requests html from www.google.com
and loads it into a text area. I then copied all of the files and placed them in a different package structure and appended "2" to the NAME constant of the second ApplicationFacade class. I also changed the URL from www.google.com
When I click the first load message button, google HTML is loaded into the text area, but when I click the second, it fires and event in the first ApplicationFacade's domain or instance.
Are the facade keys not a partition sort of like application domains? If not, we have to make sure all classes in all projects have unique names? It seems like 2 separate projects using common names would need to keep notifications separate for obvious reasons.